Main differences when using a spherical vs cylindrical indenters
Here
are the main differences when using a spherical vs cylindrical indenter:
|
Spherical Shaped Indenter

|
Cylindrical Shaped
Indenter

|
- A model should be used to fit to this data
(Hayes, Hertz, Sneddon). See Mach-1
Analysis User Manual for more information on Hayes/Hertz models.
|
- The area of contact is changing over the
course of the indentation.

|
- The area of contact is constant.

|
- The analysis must be done from the start of
the indentation.
|
- Any part of the curve can be analyzed, as
the results should be linear.
|
- The Mach-1’s Normal Indentation function can
be used to create a diagonal or “normal” contact with the surface of the
sample.

- The test can also be performed on a flat
sample.
|
- The sample must be flat, as the indentation
is purely in the Z-axis.
|
- If the sample is angled, only multiple-axis
load cells or a 1.5N single-axis should be used if the contact is
diagonal.
- Otherwise, any load cell can be used if the
sample is flat.
|
- Any load cell can be used and only on a flat
sample.
|
- Appropriate for samples where the transition
from air/liquid to sample is clear in the data.
- Data is difficult to analyse if sample is
very soft or very sticky (<1kPa).
|
- Appropriate for samples where the transition
from air/liquid to sample is clear in the data.
- More appropriate than spherical for very
soft and sticky samples (<1kPa), such as brain, spinal disk, iris,
ovary, etc.
|
Here
are some resources for training on this topic: